redundancy in networking


When talking with people, we often talk about networking. It is one of the fastest and easiest ways for us to get to know someone. It’s also one of the most difficult.

Because networking is so important, it’s always a good idea to always make it as easy as you can for your network to connect with yours. You never know when you are going to need to talk with someone, so make sure you have an easy way to do so.

In the past, when I was working at EMC, I used to get so caught up in all of the “how we did things”, that I would forget that I was talking to people. It would be like talking to yourself. It was so easy to not understand a question because I just knew the answer in my head.

Yeah, but networking is a never ending problem. For example, how do you do redundancy in your network? Every time you add a new server in a cluster, you have to make sure that all the other servers are still working properly. If one server goes down, then all of the servers go down. If you have three redundant servers, then if one goes down, you’re good. You have to make sure that your networks are in good shape for redundancy.

The network is a large part of the internet, and redundancy is important because the internet is actually quite a bit more complicated than it seems. The internet is actually comprised of hundreds of thousands of computers and thousands of routers. Each computer and each router has its own Internet Protocol (IP). However, you can’t just install a new IP on every computer in the network. All computers need to be connected to the same router.

Of course, this leads to a dilemma of how much redundancy to install. If you have a lot of computers, there’s no way you can afford to install redundancy. On the other hand, if you have a lot of routers, you can afford to install redundancy. In either case, redundancy makes sense.

When the first computer died, the rest of the network went into the other network and everything went into the other network. This is why we can’t just run a new router every time we need to.

The redundancy thing isn’t really a problem here. The problem is that the routers are really all independent from each other. Even if there is only one router running, it wont help us unless we all get to see the router and have a few hours to get some work done. And of course, if there is only one router, it might not be able to forward the packets we need to forward, causing the whole thing to fail.

Also, if we all have to talk to each other, then we might not all get to see each other, and so we wont be able to work on some project that we need to have.

For a long time, the only connection we used to be a public Wi-Fi one back in the day was a private one, one-to-one with the router on the top. This connection was available only for people to share. It was also available for anyone who was on a Wi-Fi LAN. Now, that means some people just don’t have that connection.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here